Younger Contest Puts Aging Clocks Head-to-Head in a Six-Month Public Trial
A new six-month competition lets anyone measure and attempt to reverse their biological age using epigenetic, proteomic, brain, and face clocks.
Summary
Younger is a six-month public competition hosted by NeuroAge Therapeutics alongside TruDiagnostic, Vero Bioscience, Harvard FaceAge, and BrainKey. Participants measure their biological age across brain, body, and face, make health changes of their choice, then retest. Prizes go to the greatest biological age reversal and the youngest biological age relative to chronological age. Beyond the contest, it serves as a real-world comparison of hundreds of aging clocks — epigenetic, proteomic, cognitive, facial, and functional — generating data that researchers at Stanford, Harvard, MIT, and Yale will use to understand how clocks relate to one another and what each actually measures. The event kicks off January 11–12, 2027 in San Francisco, with retests due August 2027 and winners announced in November 2027.
Detailed Summary
Aging clocks have proliferated rapidly — there are now hundreds measuring biological age from epigenetics, blood proteins, face photographs, cognitive performance, and functional tests like grip strength and VO2 max. Clinical trials have begun using them as endpoints, yet the field still lacks consensus on what each clock measures and how they relate to one another. Younger, a public six-month competition, is designed to generate exactly that comparative data at scale while simultaneously helping participants lower their own biological age.
The standard entry panel includes epigenetic clocks and eleven organ-system ages from a dried blood spot, a 30-minute smartphone cognitive test, a face photo scored by Harvard's FaceAge algorithm, and home-based functional tests covering VO2 max, grip strength, and sit-to-stand performance. An ultra tier adds two brain MRIs with volumetric analysis, a proteomic organ-age panel from Vero Bioscience, pre-release methylation clocks from Dr. Raghav Sehgal's Harvard lab, NeuroAge's RNA blood test of brain aging, and a DEXA scan. Some of these tests — particularly the Vero proteomic clock — are not yet commercially available, making the contest the only current access point.
The project lands at an important moment. A recent Nature Biotechnology reanalysis of a Phase IIa trial of Insilico Medicine's lung fibrosis drug rentosertib found that treated patients tested 2.7–3.5 years younger on six proteomic clocks, though researchers noted they cannot yet separate genuine aging slowdown from a treated lung. A 2024 Nature Medicine consensus paper from Dr. Mahdi Moqri, Dr. Luigi Ferrucci, Dr. Steve Horvath, and colleagues began mapping relationships among clocks — work that large datasets from competitions like Younger could accelerate.
The public-health framing is explicit. Researchers such as Dr. Andrew Scott and Dr. David Sinclair have valued even one additional healthy year of US life expectancy at roughly $38 trillion. Delaying dementia onset by five years could reduce its prevalence by approximately 41 percent. Helping a large cohort measurably lower biological age — and making the methods transparent — is positioned as a direct contribution toward squaring the health curve.
Participants receive personalized recommendations, community access, and monthly webinars. Reporters, longevity founders, and scientists compete alongside the public, many sharing results publicly, which creates an informal observational layer on top of the formal measurements.
Key Findings
- A single entry provides epigenetic, proteomic, cognitive, facial, and functional aging clocks at less than half the individual retail cost.
- The Vero proteomic organ-age clock is pre-commercial; the contest is currently the only public access route.
- A Nature Biotechnology reanalysis found rentosertib-treated patients scored 2.7–3.5 years younger on six proteomic clocks.
- Delaying dementia onset by five years is projected to cut its prevalence by roughly 41 percent.
- VO2 max, grip strength, and sit-to-stand are included as functional longevity biomarkers alongside epigenetic and proteomic clocks.
Methodology
This is a news report and event preview published by Longevity.Technology, not a peer-reviewed study. It references several credible primary sources including a Nature Biotechnology reanalysis and a Nature Medicine consensus paper, but the Younger competition itself has not yet produced published research data. Evidence quality is thus preliminary and promotional.
Study Limitations
The competition is a structured contest, not a randomized controlled trial, so changes in clock readings cannot be causally attributed to specific interventions. Some clocks included are pre-commercial with limited published validation data. The article is partly promotional and should be read alongside primary literature on clock concordance and clinical validity.
Enjoyed this summary?
Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.
Enter your email to subscribe:
