Longevity & AgingResearch PaperOpen Access

New TRAC Framework Defines Which Patients Clear Brain Amyloid on Anti-Amyloid Antibody Therapy

An Alzheimer's Association workgroup proposes TRAC, a PET-based label for full or partial amyloid clearance after treatment, with caveats about what it means.

Monday, October 26, 2026 0 views
Published in Alzheimers Dement
Side-by-side brain amyloid PET scans in warm colors, with red-orange cortical signal fading to cool blue after treatment, on a clinical viewing screen

Summary

As lecanemab, donanemab and aducanumab enter clinical use, an Alzheimer's Association workgroup proposes a shared term, treatment-related amyloid clearance (TRAC), for patients whose amyloid-PET scans show reduced brain amyloid after treatment. Full TRAC means PET falls below a positivity threshold. Partial TRAC means a significant drop that stays above it. Across phase 2/3 trials, about two-thirds of patients on approved antibodies reached full TRAC after about 18 months. The authors stress that TRAC is a biomarker status, not a cure or a clinical syndrome. It can reverse as amyloid re-accumulates, and a negative scan does not mean Alzheimer's disease is absent. Autopsy data are sparse, and fluid biomarkers do not fully normalize.

Detailed Summary

Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies are now approved and used in clinics, but trials used inconsistent terms and thresholds for patients whose amyloid-PET scans turned negative. Clinicians and researchers need a common vocabulary to guide management and design future studies. An Alzheimer's Association-convened workgroup of academic clinicians and scientists reviewed the literature and proposed one.

The proposed term is treatment-related amyloid clearance (TRAC). It applies to people who (1) had biomarker-confirmed amyloid deposition before treatment, (2) received an amyloid-targeting therapy, and (3) have a follow-up test showing partial or full normalization. For now the group endorses only amyloid-PET for the follow-up test and emphasizes quantitative measures such as Centiloids. Full TRAC means PET has returned to the negative range. Partial TRAC means a significant decrease that remains above the positivity criterion, a category not systematically reported before.

The review of trial data shows full TRAC rates at the longest follow-up of roughly 27-28% for gantenerumab, 31-48% for high-dose aducanumab, 68% for lecanemab in Clarity AD (<30 CL), and 68-76% for donanemab (<24.1 CL). In TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 4, 70% on donanemab reached full TRAC at 12 months versus 22% on aducanumab. Higher doses, longer treatment and lower baseline amyloid predicted full TRAC; in one analysis, those reaching it within 24 weeks started at about 93 CL versus 117 CL. Fluid markers changed less than PET: plasma p-tau217 fell under 40% and did not normalize, which fits the finding that these drugs do not lower tau-PET burden. Gantenerumab changed fluid markers comparably to approved drugs despite a weaker PET effect.

The authors stress that TRAC is a dynamic, biomarker-defined state, not neuropathological proof and not a cure. After donanemab was stopped, amyloid re-accumulated at about 3.4 CL/year, and modeling suggests a median of about 3.9 years to exceed the threshold. A negative PET after treatment should not be read as absence of AD, and biomarker relationships may differ from those in untreated disease.

Autopsy evidence is thin. None of the published treated cases showed complete plaque clearance, and none had full TRAC before death. Cases with partial clearance showed altered plaque morphology, persistent amyloid angiopathy and inflammatory changes, particularly with ARIA. The framework is expected to evolve as blood biomarkers, real-world data and autopsy findings accumulate.

Key Findings

  • TRAC has two levels: full (PET drops below a positivity threshold) and partial (large reduction but still above threshold).
  • About two-thirds of patients on approved antibodies reached full TRAC by around 18 months in phase 3 trials.
  • In TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 4, 70% on donanemab reached full TRAC at 12 months versus 22% on aducanumab.
  • Plasma p-tau217 falls under 40% on treatment and does not normalize, unlike amyloid-PET.
  • After stopping donanemab, amyloid re-accumulated at about 3.4 CL/year, so TRAC status can be transient.

Methodology

This is a consensus framework and narrative review from an Alzheimer's Association-convened expert workgroup. It synthesizes published trial data (aducanumab, lecanemab, donanemab, gantenerumab), biomarker studies and published autopsy case reports. It is not a systematic review or a new empirical study.

Study Limitations

TRAC thresholds differ across trials, and the clinical meaning of full versus partial TRAC is not yet established. Autopsy data are very limited, with no published cases that had full TRAC, and long-term re-accumulation data are scarce. Some evidence comes from unpublished or conference data, and the framework is expert consensus that will need revision.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.

Enter your email to subscribe: