Network Meta-Analysis Ranks Best Drugs for Reducing Liver Fat in MASH
A 39-trial network meta-analysis ranks pharmacologic therapies for MASH by their ability to reduce liver fat measured by MRI-PDFF.
Summary
Researchers conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 39 randomized controlled trials (3,311 participants) to rank pharmacologic therapies for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) by their ability to reduce liver fat content, measured noninvasively by MRI proton-density-fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). At 24 weeks, aldafermin and pegozafermin ranked highest for absolute fat reduction, while efinopegdutide and the semaglutide-firsocostat combination ranked highest for achieving the clinically meaningful threshold of ≥30% fat reduction. The findings offer a comparative efficacy map to guide clinical trial design, sample size calculations, and the rational selection of combination therapy regimens for MASH.
Detailed Summary
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a progressive inflammatory liver disease driving rising rates of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related mortality. As numerous pharmacologic agents enter clinical trials simultaneously, clinicians and trial designers urgently need comparative data on which agents most effectively reduce hepatic fat—a validated surrogate for treatment response—without relying on invasive liver biopsy.
This study pooled data from 39 Phase II–IV randomized controlled trials (3,311 participants, mean age ~53 years) identified through systematic searches of MEDLINE and Embase through December 2023. Investigators used Bayesian network meta-analysis to estimate the relative efficacy of 41 distinct interventions—including monotherapies and combination regimens—in reducing liver fat as measured by MRI proton-density-fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Primary outcome was absolute MRI-PDFF change; secondary outcome was achieving a ≥30% relative decline, a threshold associated with MASH histologic resolution. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) scores ranked each treatment's probability of being best.
At the 24-week primary timepoint, aldafermin (SUCRA: 83.65) and pegozafermin (SUCRA: 83.46)—both FGF21 analogs—led rankings for absolute MRI-PDFF reduction, followed by pioglitazone (SUCRA: 71.67). Aldafermin reduced MRI-PDFF by approximately 6.64 percentage points versus placebo, and pegozafermin by 6.60 points. Notably, colesevelam and sitagliptin were associated with statistically higher MRI-PDFF compared to placebo, suggesting potential harm or futility. At 12 weeks, efruxifermin (another FGF21 analog) ranked highest (SUCRA: 97.89) with a remarkable 14.4 percentage-point reduction. At 48 weeks, the cilofexor-firsocostat combination ranked first (SUCRA: 82.65). For the secondary endpoint of ≥30% MRI-PDFF decline at 24 weeks, efinopegdutide (GLP-1/GIP dual agonist, SUCRA: 67.02), semaglutide combined with firsocostat (SUCRA: 62.43), and pegbelfermin (SUCRA: 61.68) led rankings.
These results highlight FGF21 analogs and incretin-based therapies as consistently top-ranked agents across timepoints and endpoints. The superiority of certain combinations over monotherapies—particularly semaglutide plus firsocostat—supports the hypothesis that multi-mechanistic regimens targeting both lipid metabolism and inflammation may yield additive benefits. The authors note these data can directly inform sample size calculations and treatment arm selection for future phase III trials.
Several caveats temper interpretation. The network is built largely on Phase II trials with limited sample sizes, and most drug comparisons relied on a single study, precluding formal publication bias assessment. Differences in baseline patient characteristics, disease severity, and trial duration across studies introduce clinical heterogeneity. Additionally, MRI-PDFF reduction, while validated, is a surrogate endpoint; confirmatory evidence linking these rankings to hard clinical outcomes such as fibrosis regression or hepatic decompensation remains needed.
Key Findings
- Aldafermin and pegozafermin (FGF21 analogs) ranked highest for absolute MRI-PDFF reduction at 24 weeks vs. placebo.
- Efruxifermin produced the largest absolute fat reduction at 12 weeks (−14.4 percentage points vs. placebo).
- Efinopegdutide and semaglutide + firsocostat ranked best for achieving ≥30% MRI-PDFF decline at 24 weeks.
- Colesevelam and sitagliptin were associated with paradoxically higher liver fat versus placebo at 24 weeks.
- Cilofexor + firsocostat combination ranked highest for MRI-PDFF reduction at 48 weeks among available data.
Methodology
Bayesian network meta-analysis of 39 RCTs (3,311 participants) identified via MEDLINE and Embase searches through December 2023, using MCMC algorithms with fixed and random effects models evaluated by DIC. SUCRA scores ranked treatment probability of superiority; consistency between direct and indirect evidence was assessed via UME models.
Study Limitations
Most comparisons are based on single Phase II trials with small sample sizes, limiting precision of estimates and precluding formal publication bias evaluation. Substantial clinical heterogeneity exists across trials in baseline disease severity, patient demographics, and follow-up duration. MRI-PDFF is a validated surrogate but has not yet been definitively linked to long-term hard clinical outcomes in MASH.
Enjoyed this summary?
Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.
Enter your email to subscribe:
