Longevity & AgingResearch PaperPaywall

Global Experts Endorse CGM and Automated Insulin Delivery for Diabetic Pregnancies

A landmark international consensus from 24 societies sets new standards for glucose tech use across all diabetes types in pregnancy.

Monday, October 5, 2026 0 views
Published in Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
A pregnant woman wearing a CGM sensor on her arm reviewing glucose data on a smartphone in a softly lit clinic room.

Summary

An international panel of experts published a consensus statement in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology outlining best practices for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in pregnant women with type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes. Endorsed by 24 societies, the statement highlights strong evidence supporting CGM for type 1 diabetes during preconception and pregnancy, and growing evidence for AID systems in the same population. It acknowledges that appropriate CGM thresholds for gestational diabetes diagnosis and time-in-range targets for type 2 and gestational diabetes remain to be defined. The consensus covers the full reproductive window — preconception, pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum — emphasizing that better glucose control can meaningfully reduce maternal and fetal complications.

Detailed Summary

Pregnancy complicated by diabetes — whether pregestational type 1, type 2, or gestational — poses significant glycemic management challenges. Insulin resistance rises after the first trimester, increasing the risk of hyperglycemia and associated complications for both mother and child, including prenatal, perinatal, and long-term postnatal consequences. Despite these risks, over 95% of women with well-managed diabetes deliver healthy babies, underscoring the critical importance of effective glucose control strategies.

This international consensus statement, published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, synthesizes available evidence and expert opinion on the use of CGM and AID technologies throughout the reproductive period. Authored by a global team spanning five continents and endorsed by 24 professional societies, the document carries substantial clinical authority.

For women with pregestational type 1 diabetes, the evidence base is strongest. CGM has demonstrated clear benefits in reducing pregnancy complications, and AID systems — which combine CGM with algorithmic insulin pump control — show increasing promise for optimizing glycemic management across the full reproductive window, from preconception through postpartum recovery.

For type 2 and gestational diabetes, the landscape is less settled. The consensus acknowledges that CGM-based glucose thresholds for diagnosing gestational diabetes and recommended time-in-range targets for routine management of these conditions have not yet been established, representing a key gap requiring future research and clinical validation.

The practical implications are significant: clinicians managing pregnant patients with any form of diabetes now have a globally endorsed framework to guide technology adoption. However, equitable access to these technologies — particularly in lower-resource settings represented among the authorship — remains a meaningful barrier. Large randomized controlled trials in pregnant populations are still needed to solidify the evidence base.

Key Findings

  • CGM strongly recommended for pregestational type 1 diabetes during preconception and pregnancy to reduce complications.
  • AID systems endorsed for type 1 diabetes management across preconception, pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum.
  • CGM glucose thresholds for gestational diabetes diagnosis remain undefined and require further research.
  • Time-in-range targets for gestational and type 2 diabetes management during pregnancy are not yet established.
  • Consensus endorsed by 24 international societies, reflecting broad global clinical agreement.

Methodology

This is an international expert consensus statement, not a primary clinical trial. It synthesizes existing randomized and observational evidence, reviewed by a multidisciplinary panel of 23 authors from institutions across six continents. Endorsement by 24 societies signals rigorous multi-stakeholder review.

Study Limitations

Evidence for AID systems in pregnancy is still emerging and has not been tested in large randomized controlled trials specific to pregnant populations. CGM thresholds and time-in-range targets for gestational and type 2 diabetes remain undefined, limiting actionable guidance for these groups. Global access disparities may limit real-world implementation of these recommendations.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.

Enter your email to subscribe: