Cancer ResearchResearch PaperOpen Access

Vitamin B2 keeps a key anti-ferroptosis enzyme stable, and a riboflavin mimic can switch it off in cancer cells

A CRISPR screen shows riboflavin stabilizes FSP1, a shield against ferroptosis. The riboflavin analog roseoflavin disables it and sensitizes cancer cells to ferroptosis.

Friday, November 6, 2026 0 views
Published in Nat Cell Biol
Scientist pipetting pink cell culture medium into a multiwell plate under a biosafety cabinet in a cancer research lab

Summary

Ferroptosis is a form of cell death driven by membrane lipid oxidation. One defense, FSP1, recycles fat-soluble antioxidants. A CRISPR screen of about 3,000 potentially druggable genes identified riboflavin kinase, an enzyme involved in converting vitamin B2 into flavin cofactors, as a regulator of this defense. Removing it lowered FSP1 protein and sensitized cancer cells to GPX4 inhibitors. Disrupting FAD synthesis also increased lipid peroxidation and sensitivity to GPX4 inhibition. The authors additionally report that the riboflavin antimetabolite roseoflavin impairs FSP1 function and sensitizes cancer cells to ferroptosis. The supplied excerpt describes cell-based research, not evidence for changing dietary vitamin B2 intake.

Detailed Summary

Ferroptosis is a form of regulated cell death driven by membrane lipid peroxidation and implicated in cancer, neurodegeneration and ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Cells resist it through defenses including GPX4 and ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1). FSP1 uses NAD(P)H to regenerate antioxidants such as ubiquinone and vitamin K. Skafar and colleagues investigated factors that support this protective activity, identifying riboflavin metabolism as an important regulator.

The researchers engineered HT1080 cancer cells lacking GPX4 but overexpressing FSP1, making their survival dependent on FSP1. An FSP1 inhibitor killed these cells, while the ferroptosis inhibitor liproxstatin-1 rescued them. Two independent CRISPR–Cas9 screens targeting about 3,000 potentially druggable genes compared conditions with and without liproxstatin-1. The top hits were SCD1 and RFK, which encodes riboflavin kinase. RFK phosphorylates riboflavin to produce FMN, a precursor of FAD, the flavin cofactor used by FSP1.

CRISPR-mediated RFK deletion in A375 cells reduced FSP1 protein and increased sensitivity to the GPX4 inhibitors RSL3 and ML210. RFK loss also impaired viability and induced ferroptosis in the FSP1-dependent HT1080 model. However, unedited cells rapidly outcompeted RFK-deficient cells, limiting further experiments. DepMap analysis likewise indicated that RFK loss was poorly tolerated by most cell types examined.

The researchers therefore disrupted FADS, encoded by FLAD1, which catalyses the final step in FAD synthesis. FADS loss was better tolerated than RFK loss and allowed the establishment of deficient clones and addback controls. FADS-deficient A375 cells showed increased sensitivity to GPX4 inhibition and increased lipid peroxidation, with similar effects reported in the engineered HT1080 model. The excerpt also describes proteomic analysis using five technical replicates, an unpaired two-sided t-test, P < 0.05 and a minimum fold-change threshold of 1.5; it does not provide the detailed protein-level results claimed in the original summary.

The abstract and introduction conclude that riboflavin supports FSP1 stability and activity, enabling antioxidant recycling and limiting phospholipid peroxidation. The abstract additionally reports that roseoflavin, a riboflavin antimetabolite, markedly impairs FSP1 function and sensitizes cancer cells to ferroptosis. The supplied excerpt does not include its dose-response results or detailed mechanism.

These findings suggest a preclinical strategy for weakening FSP1-dependent ferroptosis resistance through riboflavin metabolism. Several immunoblots in the supplied figures were performed once, and the proteomics used technical replicates. Because the text is truncated during the Results section, later experiments and the study's complete limitations cannot be assessed. The excerpt provides no clinical evidence supporting changes to vitamin B2 intake.

Key Findings

  • Two independent CRISPR screens targeting about 3,000 potentially druggable genes in FSP1-dependent HT1080 cells identified RFK and SCD1 as the top hits for ferroptosis resistance.
  • RFK deletion in A375 cells lowered FSP1 protein and sensitized cells to RSL3 and ML210, but unedited cells rapidly outcompeted RFK-deficient cells.
  • Disrupting FADS, encoded by FLAD1, increased sensitivity to GPX4 inhibition and lipid peroxidation in A375 cells, with similar effects reported in FSP1-dependent HT1080 cells.
  • The authors report that riboflavin supports FSP1 stability and activity, helping recycle lipid-soluble antioxidants and limit phospholipid peroxidation.
  • The abstract reports that roseoflavin markedly impairs FSP1 function and sensitizes cancer cells to ferroptosis; doses and detailed mechanisms are not provided in the supplied excerpt.

Methodology

The authors engineered HT1080 cells with GPX4 knockout and FSP1 overexpression and performed two independent focused CRISPR–Cas9 screens targeting about 3,000 potentially druggable genes, comparing conditions with and without liproxstatin-1 (500 nM). Screen scores were calculated using MaGeCK. Follow-up included RFK disruption, FLAD1 knockout clones and FADS addback controls, immunoblotting, FAD quantification, alamarBlue viability assays, C11-BODIPY lipid peroxidation staining and proteomics. The proteomics comparison used five technical replicates, an unpaired two-sided t-test, P < 0.05 and a minimum fold-change threshold of 1.5. The displayed viability assays used triplicates from representative experiments, with two or three independent experiments specified. Several immunoblots were performed once. Methods for the later roseoflavin experiments are not included in the supplied excerpt.

Study Limitations

The supplied text is truncated during the Results section, preventing verification of later experiments, detailed roseoflavin mechanisms and the study's complete limitations or disclosures. The described experiments use cultured cancer cells, and the excerpt provides no animal efficacy, human treatment, toxicity or pharmacokinetic results. Several immunoblots were performed once, other displayed assays report two or three independent experiments, and the proteomics used technical replicates. RFK-deficient cells were rapidly outcompeted by unedited cells, limiting follow-up experiments. Roseoflavin's selectivity and suitability for clinical use cannot be established from the supplied material.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.

Enter your email to subscribe: