Cancer ResearchResearch PaperOpen Access

Managing the side effects of PI3K, AKT and mTOR inhibitors so breast cancer patients stay on treatment

A new ESMO Open review explains how to anticipate and treat hyperglycemia, rash, stomatitis and diarrhea from four approved breast cancer drugs.

Monday, October 19, 2026 1 view
Published in ESMO Open
An oncologist reviewing a blood glucose monitor reading with a female breast cancer patient in a bright clinic exam room

Summary

Four targeted drugs that block the PI3K/AKT/mTOR growth pathway are now approved for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: everolimus, alpelisib, capivasertib and inavolisib. They work, but they commonly cause high blood sugar, rash, mouth sores and diarrhea, and these side effects can force patients to lower the dose or stop. This review from leading oncologists pulls together safety data from the pivotal phase III trials and explains why the drugs cause each problem. It also offers practical advice on testing, preparing and monitoring patients. The authors argue that good side-effect management lets patients stay on higher doses for longer, which may improve outcomes. They also warn that safety numbers from different trials are hard to compare because the trials graded side effects differently.

Detailed Summary

The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway controls cell growth, survival and metabolism, and its dysregulation drives cancer development, treatment resistance and progression. About 35%-40% of hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancers carry activating PIK3CA mutations, a group with poor prognosis. Early drugs such as buparlisib and taselisib caused high rates of treatment discontinuation because of side effects. Newer, more selective agents are now approved, so clinicians need to know how to handle their toxicities.

This ESMO Open review by Jhaveri and colleagues summarizes safety data from the phase III trials behind four approved drugs. These are everolimus (BOLERO-2, with exemestane), alpelisib (SOLAR-1, with fulvestrant), capivasertib (CAPItello-291, with fulvestrant) and inavolisib (INAVO120, with palbociclib and fulvestrant). The authors focus on hyperglycemia, rash, stomatitis and diarrhea, covering incidence, severity, dose modifications and time to onset. They also give guidance on preparing and monitoring patients.

The review explains why these problems occur. Hyperglycemia likely arises because inhibiting AKT blocks GLUT4 translocation, which reduces glucose uptake into muscle and fat and increases glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis. Patients with undiagnosed prediabetes or limited beta-cell reserve are most vulnerable. Insulin would correct the glucose but may blunt the drugs' effect on the tumor. Rash is attributed to impaired keratinocyte growth and differentiation. Stomatitis reflects epithelial cell apoptosis plus inflammatory signaling. Diarrhea reflects disrupted gut homeostasis, reduced enterocyte function and altered mucosal immunity.

The authors stress that cross-trial comparisons are risky. BOLERO-2 (CTCAE v3) and SOLAR-1 (v4) graded hyperglycemia by fasting blood glucose. CAPItello-291 and INAVO120 used v5, which grades by intervention. Grade 3 now requires hospitalization or intravenous therapy, and events managed with oral metformin or SGLT2 inhibitors count as grade 1-2. This produces fewer high-grade events without necessarily meaning a safer drug. Trials also differed in HbA1c and fasting glucose exclusion criteria and in how adverse event terms were grouped. Long-term INAVO120 safety data are not yet available, so the authors cite the phase I/Ib GO39374 study (HbA1c below 7%) for patients treated over a year.

Biomarker testing underpins appropriate use. Inavolisib is approved in the US and EU for PIK3CA-mutated disease, including recurrence on or after adjuvant endocrine therapy, and showed a significant overall survival benefit at final analysis. Capivasertib covers PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN alterations. PIK3CA mutations are truncal and detectable in tissue or plasma. PTEN testing is more reliable in tissue, and immunohistochemistry can mislead. Everolimus was approved without a biomarker requirement. The authors call for earlier testing to guide first-line decisions.

The central message is that proactive preparation, monitoring and management of toxicities can help patients tolerate higher dose intensity, which may translate into better outcomes. This is a narrative review, so it offers expert guidance rather than new trial data, and it depends on trials that are not directly comparable.

Key Findings

  • About 35%-40% of HR-positive breast cancers carry activating PIK3CA mutations, which are linked to poor prognosis
  • Four PI3K/AKT/mTOR drugs are approved: everolimus (BOLERO-2), alpelisib (SOLAR-1), capivasertib (CAPItello-291) and inavolisib (INAVO120)
  • Hyperglycemia, rash, stomatitis and diarrhea are the common class toxicities across these agents
  • Hyperglycemia arises from blocked AKT-mediated GLUT4 translocation, increased glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis, and insulin resistance
  • CTCAE v5 (CAPItello-291, INAVO120) assigns grade 3 only with hospitalization or IV therapy, so it yields fewer high-grade events than v3/v4 fasting-glucose grading
  • Inavolisib plus palbociclib and fulvestrant showed a significant overall survival benefit at final analysis
  • PIK3CA mutations are truncal and testable in tissue or plasma, while PTEN alterations are more reliably assessed in tissue

Methodology

This is a narrative review by an international group of breast oncologists and dermatologists. It synthesizes adverse event data from phase III randomized trials of everolimus, alpelisib, capivasertib and inavolisib, supplemented by phase I/Ib GO39374 data for inavolisib. The authors compare incidence, severity, dose modifications and time to onset but do not perform a formal meta-analysis. They note differences in CTCAE versions, HbA1c and fasting glucose eligibility, and adverse event term grouping across trials.

Study Limitations

Cross-trial comparisons are unreliable because of different designs, populations, CTCAE versions and reporting methods. Long-term INAVO120 safety data are not yet available, and prospective randomized data for everolimus after CDK4/6 inhibitors are lacking. As a narrative review, its management guidance reflects expert opinion rather than controlled evidence, and the supplied text did not include author disclosures.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.

Enter your email to subscribe: