Cancer ResearchResearch PaperOpen Access

Gut Microbiome Transplant Plus Immunotherapy Gets Tested in Esophageal and Gastric Cancer

A Japanese phase I-II trial pairs antibiotics and donor stool transplant with checkpoint inhibitors in advanced esophageal and gastric cancer.

Friday, November 6, 2026 0 views
Published in Future Oncol
A clinician in scrubs holding a syringe of donor microbiota solution beside a colonoscopy monitor in an endoscopy suite

Summary

Advanced esophageal and stomach cancers are hard to treat, and immunotherapy helps only some patients. Because gut bacteria influence immune function, researchers in Japan are testing whether resetting the gut microbiome can improve the response. Patients take three antibiotics for one week to clear existing bacteria. They then receive a single dose of healthy donor stool bacteria through a colonoscope, and start immunotherapy the next day. This paper describes the trial plan rather than results. The main goal is safety, and the team will also track tumor shrinkage and survival. Blood, stool, and tissue samples will be studied to find markers that predict who benefits. Seven patients had enrolled as of August 2025. The approach is promising but unproven.

Detailed Summary

Esophageal and gastric cancers remain difficult to treat. Even with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) added to chemotherapy, median overall survival after first-line therapy is estimated at only 13–17 months. Evidence suggests the gut microbiota shapes systemic and antitumor immunity. In metastatic melanoma, a single fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from healthy donors before anti-PD-1 therapy was linked to a 65% response rate, versus roughly 30% typically reported. A 2024 phase Ib trial also found that FMT from responders restored benefit in anti-PD-1-refractory solid tumors.

This paper is a protocol description, not a results report, for a single-institution phase I-II trial at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan (jRCTs031240170). Patients take oral amoxicillin (1,500 mg/day), fosfomycin (3,000 mg/day), and metronidazole (750 mg/day) for one week (minimum five days) to reduce resident bacteria. At least two days later, they receive one 200 mL dose of donor microbiota solution by total colonoscopy, and ICI-containing therapy starts the next day. The solution is prepared by Juntendo University and Metagen Therapeutics. The authors cite ulcerative colitis data showing remission of 82% with antibiotic pretreatment versus 58% without.

A safety part enrolls 3–6 patients per cohort (6–12 total). Cohort 1 receives chemotherapy plus nivolumab or pembrolizumab, and cohort 2 (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma only) receives nivolumab plus ipilimumab. If safety criteria are met, an expansion part enrolls 10 patients per cohort: two esophageal cohorts and one gastric cohort. Eligible patients are adults with ECOG performance status 0–1, measurable disease, and adequate organ function. Exclusions include HER2-positive tumors, inflammatory bowel disease, active autoimmune disease, recent steroids or immunosuppressants, active infection, and HIV or hepatitis B/C. Donors undergo extensive pathogen, blood, and stool screening, including drug-resistant bacteria and SARS-CoV-2.

The primary endpoint is dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) from day 1 to day 28 after FMT. DLT means grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity possibly related to FMT, or a delay of 14 days or more in chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints are response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events, with CT every 8 weeks and then every 12 weeks after week 24. Efficacy uses the first stage of Simon's two-stage futility design. Threshold response rates are 45% (fluorouracil/cisplatin plus PD-1 antibody), 30% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and 50% (gastric chemotherapy plus nivolumab). A cohort stops if responders number ≤5/10, ≤4/10, or ≤6/11.

Translational work is extensive. Stool is collected after antibiotics and at 4 and 8 weeks, blood at 8 weeks, and tumor and intestinal epithelial biopsies before and after treatment. Flow cytometry will profile CD4+, CD8+, and regulatory T cells, NK cells, MAIT cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Immunohistochemistry will assess changes in the tumor immune microenvironment. Multi-omics analyses (metabolomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, genomics) aim to identify predictive biomarkers.

Enrollment began in June 2024, and seven patients had enrolled by August 2025, but no safety or efficacy data are reported. The design is single-arm with small cohorts, so it cannot separate the effect of FMT from antibiotics or from standard ICI therapy. Results will be preliminary and hypothesis-generating, and larger randomized studies would be needed to confirm any benefit.

Key Findings

  • Seven patients enrolled between June 2024 and August 2025; no efficacy or safety results are reported yet
  • Median overall survival after first-line ICI plus chemotherapy in these cancers is estimated at only 13–17 months
  • Prior melanoma work cited a 65% response rate with FMT plus anti-PD-1 versus about 30% typical for anti-PD-1 alone
  • Ulcerative colitis FMT remission was 82% with antibiotic pretreatment versus 58% without, supporting the A-FMT rationale
  • Regimen: 1 week of amoxicillin 1,500, fosfomycin 3,000, and metronidazole 750 mg/day, then one 200 mL colonoscopic FMT, with ICI starting the next day
  • Safety part enrolls 6–12 patients total; expansion enrolls 10 per cohort, with futility stops at ≤5/10, ≤4/10, or ≤6/11 responders
  • Primary endpoint is dose-limiting toxicity over days 1–28, with CT response assessment every 8 weeks

Methodology

This is a protocol (version 3.2) for a single-institution, single-arm phase I-II trial in Japan, with a safety confirmation part followed by an expansion part. Cohorts are separated by cancer type and regimen: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint is dose-limiting toxicity graded by CTCAE v5.0 over 28 days. Efficacy uses the first stage of Simon's two-stage design, with futility thresholds based on historical response rates. Analysis sets include the full analysis set, per-protocol set, and safety analysis set.

Study Limitations

The authors note the study is ongoing with no outcome data, and the single-arm design lacks a control group, so benefit cannot be attributed specifically to FMT or antibiotics. Cohorts are small (about 10 patients each), and esophageal and gastric cancers differ biologically. The collaboration with Metagen Therapeutics, which helps prepare the FMT product, is disclosed in the study design; formal conflict-of-interest statements were not provided in the supplied text.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.

Enter your email to subscribe: