Cancer ResearchResearch PaperOpen Access

A new mTORC1-selective cancer drug controls disease in 64% of patients with little hyperglycemia

In a 57-patient phase 1 trial, RMC-5552 blocked mTORC1 while sparing mTORC2. Hyperglycemia was just 4%, and a tacrolimus mouthwash cut mucositis.

Sunday, October 11, 2026 1 view
Published in Clin Cancer Res
An oncology infusion suite with an IV bag and pump beside a reclining patient chair in a bright clinic

Summary

Older mTOR-blocking cancer drugs are limited by side effects, especially high blood sugar and painful mouth sores. RMC-5552 is a new drug designed to block only one mTOR complex (mTORC1) and spare the other (mTORC2), which helps control blood sugar. In a first-in-human trial, 57 people with advanced solid tumors received weekly IV infusions. Mouth sores (49%), nausea (44%), and fatigue (42%) were the most common drug-related side effects. High blood sugar occurred in only 4% of patients and did not limit dosing. A tacrolimus mouthwash lowered mouth sores from 65% to 31% at mid-range doses. Overall, 64% of patients had their disease controlled, and one woman with endometrial cancer had a complete response lasting over six months. This is early-stage evidence, but it supports selective mTORC1 targeting.

Detailed Summary

The PI3K/mTOR pathway controls cell growth, survival, and protein synthesis, and it is hyperactive in many cancers. Genomic alterations in this pathway occur in roughly 38% of tumors, and PTEN protein loss is seen in about 30% of solid tumors even though PTEN mutations are found in only 6% to 9%. Existing drugs have fallen short. Rapalogs such as everolimus and temsirolimus inhibit 4EBP1 incompletely and cause mucositis. ATP-competitive pan-mTOR inhibitors like sapanisertib block mTORC2 and Akt, causing frequent hyperglycemia, which still reached 33% when metformin was added.

RMC-5552 is the first clinical example of a third-generation, bi-steric mTOR inhibitor. It links rapamycin to an ATP-site inhibitor so that it engages both the allosteric and active sites of mTORC1. It potently suppresses phosphorylation of both 4EBP1 and S6 kinase and is about 40-fold selective for mTORC1 over mTORC2 in cell-based assays. The goal is strong antitumor activity without the insulin-resistance effects tied to mTORC2 inhibition, along with less receptor tyrosine kinase feedback.

This was an open-label, multicenter, first-in-human dose-escalation study (NCT04774952) in adults with advanced solid tumors. Fifty-seven patients received RMC-5552 as a weekly intravenous infusion at 1.6 to 16 mg. The researchers assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity. They also tested tacrolimus mouthwash (TM) as mucositis prophylaxis and tracked circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for changes in PI3K/mTOR pathway variants.

The most common treatment-related adverse events were mucositis (49%), nausea (44%), and fatigue (42%). Treatment-related hyperglycemia occurred in only 4% of patients and was not dose limiting. This contrasts with the high hyperglycemia rates reported for pan-mTOR inhibitors and supports the idea that sparing mTORC2 preserves glucose regulation at clinically active doses.

TM was tested because tacrolimus competes for FKBP12 binding and was predicted to block the drug's mechanism locally in the mouth. Between 8 and 12 mg, mucositis occurred in 65% of patients without TM and 31% with TM. This is consistent with an on-mechanism effect. The text available to me does not detail how patients were assigned to TM, so this should be viewed as promising but preliminary.

For efficacy, the disease control rate was 64%. One patient with PTEN- and PIK3CA-altered endometrial cancer had a complete response, still ongoing at more than six months as of the June 2024 data cut. ctDNA showed clearance of selected PI3K/mTOR pathway variants, which also fits selective on-target activity. Important caveats apply. This is a single-arm phase 1 study with a heterogeneous population and no control group, and disease control rate is a modest efficacy measure. Revolution Medicines sponsored the trial, and several authors are company employees. The findings support further testing, alone or in combinations, in PI3K/mTOR-driven cancers, but they do not establish survival benefit.

Key Findings

  • Phase 1 dose escalation enrolled 57 patients with advanced solid tumors, treated with weekly IV RMC-5552 at 1.6–16 mg
  • Most common treatment-related adverse events were mucositis (49%), nausea (44%), and fatigue (42%)
  • Treatment-related hyperglycemia occurred in only 4% of patients and was not dose limiting, versus 33% reported for sapanisertib plus metformin
  • At 8–12 mg, mucositis was 65% without tacrolimus mouthwash versus 31% with it
  • Disease control rate was 64% across the study population
  • One patient with PTEN- and PIK3CA-altered endometrial cancer achieved a complete response, ongoing more than 6 months at the June 2024 data cut
  • ctDNA showed clearance of selected PI3K/mTOR pathway variants, consistent with on-mechanism antitumor activity

Methodology

This was an open-label, multicenter, first-in-human phase 1 dose-escalation trial (NCT04774952) of RMC-5552 monotherapy in 57 adults with advanced solid tumors. Patients received weekly intravenous infusions from 1.6 to 16 mg, with primary endpoints of safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics and secondary assessment of preliminary activity, including disease control rate and ctDNA dynamics. Tacrolimus mouthwash prophylaxis was evaluated for mucositis, with results reported descriptively across dose levels. The text available to me did not include detailed statistical methods or the full dose-limiting toxicity analysis.

Study Limitations

This is an early, single-arm phase 1 trial in a heterogeneous population of 57 patients with no control group, so efficacy signals such as the 64% disease control rate and a single complete response are preliminary. The mouthwash comparison was between dose-range subgroups and should be considered hypothesis-generating. The study was sponsored by Revolution Medicines, and several authors are company employees.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.

Enter your email to subscribe: